ª×èͺ·¤ÇÒÁ | Developmentof Training Packages on Learning Management for Developing Students’ Analytical Thinking in Multicultural Society for Teachers in Five Southern Border Provinces |
---|---|
»ÃÐàÀ·¡ÒõվÔÁ¾ì | »ÃЪØÁÇÔªÒ¡ÒÃÃдѺªÒµÔ |
ª×èͧҹ»ÃЪØÁÇÔªÒ¡ÒÃ/ÇÒÃÊÒà | 㹡ÒûÃЪØÁÇÔªÒ¡ÒÃàʹͼŧҹÇÔ¨ÑÂÃдѺºÑ³±ÔµÈÖ¡ÉÒáËè§ªÒµÔ ¤ÃÑ駷Õè 51 December 18th 2020 |
¼Ùéáµè§ |
¨ØäÃÈÔÃÔ ªÙÃÑ¡Éì |
Çѹ·ÕèµÕ¾ÔÁ¾ì/¹ÓàÊ¹Í | 18 ¸.¤. 2563 |
»Õ·Õè | 51 |
©ºÑº·Õè | 1 |
ËÁÒÂàŢ˹éÒ | 1-11 |
Åѡɳк·¤ÇÒÁ | º·¤ÇÒÁÇÔ¨ÑÂËÃ×ͺ·¤ÇÒÁÇÔªÒ¡ÒéºÑºÊÁºÙóì·ÕèµÕ¾ÔÁ¾ìã¹ ÃÒ§ҹÊ׺à¹×èͧ¨Ò¡¡ÒûÃЪØÁÇÔªÒ¡ÒÃÃдѺªÒµÔ |
Abstract | The objectives of this research were : 1) to develop the training packages on learning management for developing students’ analytical thinking in multicultural society for teachers in five southern border provinces, 2) to study the result of the using of the training packages on learning management for developing students’ analytical thinking in multicultural society for teachers in five southern border, and 3) to compare the students’ analytical thinking between before and after being taught for developing students’ analytical thinking. The main target groups consisted of 45 teachers teaching in basic education in five southern border provinces and the minor target groups consisted of students in the classes of the main target groups. The research tools comprised of 1) training packages on learning management for developing students’ analytical thinking, 2) a teachers’ achievement test, 3) a teachers’ performance test, 4) a questionnaire of teachers’ satisfaction towards the training packages, 5) a focus group form for gathering teachers’ opinion and 6) students’ analytical thinking test. Analytical statistics were mean, standard deviation and percentage. Research found that: 1. Teachers desired to attend the training, Educators’ opinion showed that it was necessary to develop teachers on learning for developing students’ analytical thinking, the literature and research found that training affected teachers’ analytical thinking higher than before being trained and also affected students’ taught by the trained teachers. 2. The training packages on learning management were totally appropriate at the highest value. 3. Teachers’ learning achievements after the training on learning management of developing students’ analytical thinking was higher than before being trained with the score improvement of 23.50%. 4. The trained teachers’ learning achievements was higher than untrained teachers with the different score of 21.63%. 5. Teachers’ performance on learning management after the training was at an excellent level with score at 80.64% and untrained teachers was at moderate level with score at 61.60%, the score was different at 19.04. 6. Teachers’ satisfaction towards using the training packages was at high level with average at 4.25. 7. Teachers’ opinion towards using the training packages was totally agreed that they obviously improved their knowledge after the training and to develop student’s analytical thinking needed times and continuity. 8. The analytical thinking of all grades of students after being taught by the trained teachers was higher than before, by grade 1 to grade 12 improved higher scores at the percentage of 30.67, 30.00, 27.27, 23.14, 36.24, 29.48, 38.63, 26.21, 28.38, 28.60, 29.43 and 25.83 respectively. Development of Training Packages on Learning Management for Developing Students’ Analytical Thinking in Multicultural Society for Teachers in Five Southern Border Provinces http://libapp.tsu.ac.th/OJS/index.php/thaksinprocedia 2 9. The analytical thinking of all grades of students after being taught by the untrained teachers was higher than before, by grade 1 to grade 12 improved higher scores at the percentage of 11.73, 5.60, 8.80, 6.38, 12.19, 10.76, 13.54, 10.25, 15.25, 9.80, 14.03 and 11.43 respectively. Keywords: Training Packages, Learning Management, Analytical Thinking, Multicultural Society, Five Southern Border Provinces |